Summary

  (tcabin) tcw tc real
l3n8-1m 3.22 3
l3n8-2m 7.55 $ \approx$ 6 (mut+)
l3n8-3m 7.77 $ \approx$ 25
l5n8-1m (4.3) 8.7 20
l5n8-2m (1.11) 2.22 no
l5n8-3m (3.89) 7.79 27
l5n32-1m (4.48) 8.97 60
l5n32-2m (5.7) 11.4 no
l5n32-3m (9.4) 18.8 80
l5n32-1 (7) 8 no
l5n32-2 (7) 14 18
l5n32-3 (4) 8 25
l5n128-1m (10.6) 21.27 51
l5n128-2m (7.0) 14.0 47
l5n128-3m (7.78) 15.57 no
l5n128-1 (7.15) 14.3 no
l5n128-2 (7.8) 15.6 39
l5n128-3 (10.2) 20.4 70

As an inspection of these results reveals there is no consistent behavior of the values. Without mutation as well with mutation show the results different outcomes. Also the fact that in some cases we use $ \vert 2^l\vert$ many members of a population or only 25% of them does not mark a real difference. The main point is that even in the case of no mutation the predictions do not comply with the empirical measures.

Gerd Doeben-Henisch 2012-03-31